<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution fine but no apology to Darwin: Vatican</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evolutiondiary.com/2008/09/18/evolution-fine-but-no-apology-to-darwin-vatican/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evolutiondiary.com/2008/09/18/evolution-fine-but-no-apology-to-darwin-vatican/</link>
	<description>Darwinian Evolution News, Videos and Articles for Everyone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:47:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Santiago</title>
		<link>http://evolutiondiary.com/2008/09/18/evolution-fine-but-no-apology-to-darwin-vatican/comment-page-1/#comment-35316</link>
		<dc:creator>Santiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolutiondiary.com/2008/09/18/evolution-fine-but-no-apology-to-darwin-vatican/#comment-35316</guid>
		<description>I agree with Professor Agazzi, who says: If you read Darwin&#039;s books, Darwin directly, You can see that he was never opposed to the idea of Creation. Never. He was always opposed to the idea of individual species being created by God or by Someone, Separately rather than being the result of a transformation. What happens nowadays? Unfortunately once again in the United States there is a minority of fundamentalist Evangelicals, Seeking to take the Bible word for word, as a discourse that tells us how the world was created. They call themselves creationists. Once again the term has been seized for another use. The term &quot;creationists&quot; does not mean in the slightest. That the book of Genesis should be taken as a true story about the Cosmos. But for them it does. They say yes, here is something that at the very least. Should be taught alongside the theory of evolution.. Once again a mistake has been made. And people say, Creationists are enemies of science and enemies of Evolution.
Regards,
Santiago Chiva
Granada, Spain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Professor Agazzi, who says: If you read Darwin&#8217;s books, Darwin directly, You can see that he was never opposed to the idea of Creation. Never. He was always opposed to the idea of individual species being created by God or by Someone, Separately rather than being the result of a transformation. What happens nowadays? Unfortunately once again in the United States there is a minority of fundamentalist Evangelicals, Seeking to take the Bible word for word, as a discourse that tells us how the world was created. They call themselves creationists. Once again the term has been seized for another use. The term &#8220;creationists&#8221; does not mean in the slightest. That the book of Genesis should be taken as a true story about the Cosmos. But for them it does. They say yes, here is something that at the very least. Should be taught alongside the theory of evolution.. Once again a mistake has been made. And people say, Creationists are enemies of science and enemies of Evolution.<br />
Regards,<br />
Santiago Chiva<br />
Granada, Spain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

